As I
completed the Language vs. Acquisition
activity, there were a few activities that I felt could be seen from both
views. Traci and I shared our ideas
about each activity, which helped because often I would feel as if an activity
was acquisition based, but she would offer an argument for why it could also be
a learning view activity. It seemed as
if we could create a scenario for each activity to fit our opinions!
For
example, under the student category it stated, “make a Venn diagram to compare
two stories”. If directly taught by the
teacher with a focus on using correct language, organization, and systematic
instruction on what type of information to include in the diagram, then this
could be a learning view exercise. By
extending this strategy in an acquisition classroom, students could choose their
own focus of the diagram (actions, appearances, beliefs, etc.) and/or
internalize the important elements from the reading to include in the diagram.
I think
that many students benefit from both a learning and acquisition view. Students often need direct and systematic
instruction but also need to understand the importance of making meaning when
reading and writing.
Jenny,
ReplyDeleteI agree when you state, "I think that many students benefit from both a learning and acquisition view." Depending on how you look at the activities, they could fit in each view! In order to ensure our students' success we need both. Good post!
Donna